12/31/2023 0 Comments Xdream inc aaron taylor![]() Much better solution to avoid calling SA in the first place for those users. If you have users that really do not want their mail marked as spam, its is a Spamassassin to determine the message recipient. Your MTA doesn't add any headers indicative of this, there's no way for SpamAssassin will *try* to find out who the BCC'ed recipient is, but if Generally NOT match any messages which are BCC'ed to you, including mailing Some general notes about this kind of problem:īear in mind that "whitelist_to", "more_spam_to" and "all_spam_to" commands will Until then, no one knows that the problem is, and as such,Īlso, post the whitelist entry you're using. > spam we can look to see what rules hit which would answer your "why?" > Perhaps if you posted the headers of the messages that were marked as > Even some of my cron jobs are getting a label when they should > some e-mail are getting the label of spam. > All right, the short and simple is that Spam-Assassin may not be doing This is Ici Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!īetter to serve in Heaven that to Rule in Hell. Some e-mail are getting the label of spam.Įven some of my cron jobs are getting a label when they should nt. Update that white list (replace the file of "acceptable" email addressesĪll right, the short and simple is that Spam-Assassin may not be doing Seem to be working as it should/intended and there is also been no way to Well, it's been a couple months now and the Whitelist doesn't (Note I am saying spam filtering - not the standard antivirusĬhecking). Through - regardless of spam filtering and that their emails would not be "whitelist" approach - to ensure that people on that whitelist were allowed I haven't heard of any lately, but that was why we went to a They get an email from us with "spam" marked in it Īlso, a number of members at one time or another could not send email Noticing anymore the spam label - since every email seems to have it) and Within the organization when we "accidentally" reply to a member (not "spam" and it is creating problems for us. ![]() We didn't ask for our emails to be labeled with Going to go over them here again so we don't lose sight of them:ģ) Email issues. Our issues are major to us - and it seems we have a number of them, so I am (even if some spam slipped through with it - we would rather not miss Your Spam filters (Spam Assassin) pass all legitimate emails through to us Really for us - we would rather not have anything labeled as spam AT ALL. ![]() This is nuts! If it doesn't work - it doesn't work!Īlso can we raise the threshold on the spam to 7.5 instead of 5.00 (7.5 > Were addressed to me from Rhonda and one from Jim Wooley - both were labeled Hi Dave - we are still getting people labeled as sending us spam that shouldīe on that white list (this includes emails from employees). Forwarded message from Angry and Concerned Customer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |